The Japanese Traditional Structure of Quick Response Assignment

The Japanese Traditional Structure of Quick Response - Assignment Example Light has been shed on how the supply chain structure leads to the success of such a business. Moreover, an analysis of the future effects of the Japan-Korean fashion collaboration in the setting of globalization in the fashion industry is elaborated. Major apparel firms work at introducing new styles every week. This is to be able to meet the demand of the Japanese young women market that is characterized by a fast-moving trend cycle with a great diversity of choices in styles. Studies show that fast fashion has a real effect on the supply chain for the fashion product, but the consumer demand is the main driving force that determines this fast fashion. This contrasts with the previous theories on the supply chain, which have been solely supplying driven aspects. Fast fashion is a phenomenon that is developed as a direct result of changing anticipations and demand from customers (Lea-Greenwood, 2006, p. 266). In addition, there is a tradition among the Japanese people that makes them prefer many varieties and have an interest in the craft. This calls for their fashion styles to be always changing apart from being unique from those of their counterparts. The organizations do not mainly depend on the seasonal collection, but they e nsure that there is a compressed time interval between the moment a product is designed and the moment that is used. This compression is attained either by lumping together selections that are more regular or through an ongoing redesigning and unchanging new production. In other words, the Just - in - Time (JIT) supply chain management theory is upheld. It entails â€Å"having the items of the right quality and quantity in the right place at the right time† (Cheng et al, 1996, p.2).  

How did the Constitution impact the development of American freedom Essay

How did the Constitution impact the development of American freedom - Essay Example The foremost reason for the proposal of the amendment of the articles was to ensure a harmonious operation of the states1 under an active central government. It was mainly to achieve union of the states given that it was not operational in most other states. The proposal for amendment, however, was not feasible. Many states were uncomfortable with the articles and cited possibilities of failure to materialize and function in such states. Since achieving a consensus among the thirteen states was a great challenge, the necessity for a new document led to the drafting of the constitution. Drafted in 1787 and ratified in 1788, the constitution became operational in 1789. The constitution would create a powerful central government as required by proponents of its drafting. The drafted constitution would turn out to form an efficient government that endured successful operation of the confederation. Some of the thirteen states greatly supported the necessity to change the articles that wer e the foundations of the initial government. According to the provisions of the articles, there were thirteen elected delegates. That formed the national congress. The basis of most decisions was on the conformity of majority delegates in the national congress since the state had single representative and vote. Advocates of reforms of the articles cited reasons as loose confederacy of the different states. The articles granted limited authority to the central government, over the states. States were too powerful under the articles. The